Why AI Can’t Replace Sterile Processing and Operating Room Professionals
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming many facets of healthcare, improving patient outcomes, and enhancing the efficiency of medical procedures. However, many fear AI will replace human healthcare professionals, particularly in highly specialized areas such as the operating room (OR) and sterile processing (SP). Let’s explore the role of AI in these critical departments and explain why AI is a valuable tool for enhancing rather than replacing human expertise.
AI and sterile processing
How exactly will AI impact sterile processing? The verdict is still out on that one. There is potential for errors whenever we have thousands of instruments, surgical devices, and pieces of equipment necessary for reprocessing and sterilization. We also have a plethora of data that coincides with each device.
Multiple instrument tracking systems on the market act as a place where data is stored, inventories are managed, and workflows are improved. The issue we see is that there is so much data and so little translation of how that data acts to serve us and, ultimately, our end-users (the patients). Mistakes occur in both the OR and SP, and they are inevitable because humans make errors, but the numbers speak volumes
“In American hospitals alone, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) estimates that HAIs account for an estimated 1.7 million infections and 99,000 associated deaths each year.”1
AI as a friend
It’s possible that AI can become our friend to help in error reduction as we navigate the thousands of variables in SP. Here are a few areas that it could serve:
- Identifying instruments that are more likely to require extra attention during cleaning and sterilization allows technicians to prioritize instrumentation and ensure they are properly reprocessed
- Monitoring the sterilization process to ensure instruments are properly sterilized before use
- Monitoring sterilization equipment to alert technicians if anything in the sterilization process is awry
AI cannot replace the expertise of human healthcare professionals in sterile processing. Technicians rely on their training, experience, and judgment to ensure that instruments are properly processed and ready for use. AI can provide valuable insights and support, but it is ultimately up to technicians to ensure the instruments are correctly processed.
AI and the operating room
We all know that the most minor mistakes in the OR can have life-altering consequences. We have multiple team members necessary to complete a procedure, from the surgeon to the anesthesiologist, reps, nurses, and techs. Now sprinkle in the massive amount of equipment needed to execute a single procedure, including surgical instrumentation, monitors, lighting, integration systems, scopes, back tables, and more. The number of moving parts necessary to complete a case efficiently and safely is mind-blowing.
Here are a few areas where AI can serve our ORs:
- Monitoring vital signs
- Providing real-time feedback to surgeons during a procedure, helping them make more informed decisions
- Identify potential risks before a procedure even begins; for example, AI can analyze patient data to predict the likelihood of complications during a procedure
The devil is in the details
How incredible is it that we can now provide insights into potential interventions before we even need them? The saying states that the devil is in the details, and one of the biggest challenges of an OR is the variables we cannot predict.
While AI can provide valuable insights and support in the operating room, the human touch, years of training and expertise, and the professionals behind each decision can never be replaced. Surgeons, nurses, and techs rely on their expertise, experience, and judgment to make critical decisions that data and monitoring never can. AI can provide real-time data and insights, but ultimately, the teams are where healthcare’s magic and the care part kick in.
As technology continues to advance, we must continue to adapt accordingly, choosing to bring the puzzle pieces to our sterile fields that don’t cross the line, but rather elevate the capabilities.
- “Healthcare-Acquired Infections (HAIs),” PatientCareLink.org, accessed October 26, 2023, https://www.patientcarelink.org/improving-patient-care/healthcare-acquired-infections-hais/.
Enzymes have a specific range of temperature in which they work well. Too cold means less or no activity. Too hot and the enzymes start to denature (fall apart). This is shown in the graph here.
Enzymes work by fitting a target molecule into a matching shape in the enzyme where the molecule is held so it can be broken down. Let’s call this area the “chop shop” to be biologically inaccurate, but as clear as
possible as to what happens in it. If the enzyme denatures, the shape of the holding area in the enzyme changes and the target molecule no longer fits. If it doesn’t fit, it can’t be broken down by the enzyme.
Enzymes break down certain items well, and others not at all. Typical enzymes found in enzyme detergents for medical device applications are:
- Proteases, which break down proteins like blood fibrin, as well as muscle and other tissue residues
- Lipases, which break down fats and oils
- α-amylases, which break down carbohydrates, starches, and sugars
Proteases have little-to-no effect on fats, oils, carbohydrates, starches, and sugars. Lipases have little-to-no effect on proteins, carbohydrates, starches, and sugars. And α-amylases have little-to-no effect on proteins, fats, and oils. Enzymes are very picky eaters. So, what happens if you change the nature of the soil that you want the enzymes to break down? They don’t know how to attack it and they won’t effectively break it down. How do you change the nature of the soil that the enzymes are supposed to break down? Heat it up too high.
What happens to the soil in a washer load as you raise the temperature?
- Get above about 95°F/35°C and blood clots
- Get much above about 120°F/50°C and biological molecules like proteins (patient soil) begin to denature
Suddenly, the picky eaters that are enzymes don’t like what they are presented with to break down and don’t know how to eat them. If you heat up a target molecule, it changes. Clotted blood is not the same as blood. Proteins, fats, or carbohydrates are not the same when they are denatured as they were when they were in their original form. As the enzymes change in shape with higher temperature, the target molecules that make up the soil also change in shape. Even if the enzymes don’t change because of the increased temperature (they do, but let’s look at one effect at a time), the soil molecules do, and they don’t fit in the enzymes’ chop shops anymore. So, the enzymes can’t do their job.
Because of this, cleaning processes must run at a temperature that is a compromise between the need for speed (higher temperature) and the need to avoid denaturation (shape change) of the soil molecules and the enzymes (not too hot).
The manufacturers of enzyme detergents (most of them) know about the need for this compromise and have tested their detergents at different temperatures. This is how they come up with the range of temperatures over which the detergent will be effective. These temperatures are in the detergent IFU. If they are not in the detergent IFU, ask. If you don’t get a clear answer, use a different manufacturer’s detergent.
But this isn’t the whole story. In many cases, especially in manual soaking, but also on many washer-disinfectors and ultrasonics, you can set the temperature of the enzyme cleaning phase. If you can set the temperature, and if you want to find the temperature for the best cleaning, you can do a study using cleaning indicators to see what the effect is on cleaning by using enzyme detergents at different temperatures.
To make sure that you can see the effect of temperature, you’ll want to run a shortened cycle so you don’t get the indicator completely clean. What? Why? Because if it’s completely clean, you can’t see if the process did a better or worse job at cleaning it. When you are done with the comparison testing, change the cycle phase length back to where it was. You should have clean indicators with a safety margin beyond just making it over the cleaning finish line.
What about the load and the soil (okay, bioburden)? Different procedures leave different soil behind. Some procedures are bloody. Some result in a lot of fats (liposuction, procedures on fatty areas). You want to make sure that both the detergent and the cleaning procedure you are using respect that aspect of the load. If it’s bloody, a nice, cold water soak is a great way to start by getting rid of the hemoglobin. If it’s fatty, the lipase has to be given enough time to do its job (at the right temperature).
Unlike steam sterilization, cleaning is a multidimensional problem with a lot of factors that must be taken into account. If you take them into account, you can build a robust cleaning procedure that removes the soils from the instruments in ways that are best for the soils at hand. This will give you the best cleaning performance and the greatest margin of safety for avoiding recleaning and potential infection of staff from soiled instruments on the clean side, and most importantly, improve patient safety.
As Goldilocks taught us, we want the bowl of porridge that isn’t too cold or too hot. We want the one that is just right.